The range of diagnostic tests coupled with medical advances in equipment at our disposal can make it difficult to decide on what the priorities should be for the population either in the local community or in the workforce when it comes to preventative health. The good news is that preventative health screening is guided by a
series of basic principles that are now nearly 50 years old but are equally valid today. Use these to help you make decisions on the design of any wellness programme.
In 1968 the
Wilson-Jungner criteria for appraising the validity of screening programmes
was published by the World Health Organisation. The criteria set a series of
basic rules to ensure that health screening and the test applied under the
banner of health screening are necessary and beneficial for the individual.
1.
The condition being tested for should
be an important health problem.
2.
There should be a treatment for
the condition.
3.
Facilities for diagnosis and
treatment should be available.
4.
There should be a latent stage of
the disease.
5.
There should be a test or
examination for the condition.
6.
The test should be acceptable to
the population.
7.
The natural history of the
disease should be adequately understood.
8.
There should be an agreed policy
on whom to treat.
9.
The total cost of finding a case
should be economically balanced in relation to medical expenditure as a whole.
10. Case-finding should be a continuous process, not just a "once and
for all" project.
World Health Organisation 1968
At Full Health, we use these principles to guide us to do the right thing by the end user we serve. This helps us to design health screening and wellness programmes that are genuinely beneficial to both employees in the workplace and patients and end consumers in the community.
Furthermore, the aggregated anonymised data helps underpin that value. A tool such as Full Health that gives a consistency in approach regardless of the intermediary provider who delivers the service ensures that there is a clear return on investment for employers and wider commissioning groups versus just a box ticked and no clear return.
Download the Full Health Corporate Brochure
Furthermore, the aggregated anonymised data helps underpin that value. A tool such as Full Health that gives a consistency in approach regardless of the intermediary provider who delivers the service ensures that there is a clear return on investment for employers and wider commissioning groups versus just a box ticked and no clear return.
Download the Full Health Corporate Brochure
No comments:
Post a Comment